Response to Patton’s ‘Why I’m Not Charismatic’

Scott and Marv over at To Be Continued have just finished the last of the 8-part series “Response to Patton’s ‘Why I’m Not Charismatic’” (a 22-page PDF file). They’ve done a good job in critiquing Patton’s paper and causing us, in every position, to consider our own arguments more carefully. [ Added: …and here’s their response all on a 43-page PDF file ]

Post 1 – by Marv
Post 2 – by Scott
Post 3 – by Marv
Post 4 – by Scott
Post 5 – by Marv
Post 6 – by Scott
Post 7 – by Marv
Post 8 – by Scott

6 thoughts on “Response to Patton’s ‘Why I’m Not Charismatic’”

T.C. R

07/15/2010 at 19:42 Reply

I’m planning on reading this document and encouraging others to do the same. 😉

LikeLike
Kevin S.

07/15/2010 at 18:19 Reply

I would consider myself charismatic too but I should probably be considered a “continuationist” too. It’s a term we all have to become more familiar with. Problem is, not many have ever heard of this term.

LikeLike
Nathan Stitt

07/15/2010 at 07:08 Reply

I skimmed through the discussion, and there was some good coverage of terminology in particular. I loosely refer to myself as a Pentecostal or Charismatic, though it seems perhaps “Continuationist” is probably the most accurate descriptor. Thanks for taking the time to link to everything. 8)

LikeLike
ScottL

07/15/2010 at 05:13 Reply

Hey, we have also just posted up a PDF document as well. You can get it by clicking here.

LikeLike
1. Kevin S.
  
  07/15/2010 at 17:45 Reply
  
  Thanks Scott. I’ve added the link to it on the post too. It’ll be easier to read everything on a single document.
  
  LikeLike
  1. ScottL
    
    07/16/2010 at 13:36 Reply
    
    Thanks Kevin.
    
    LikeLike