Scott and Marv over at To Be Continued have just finished the last of the 8-part series “Response to Patton’s ‘Why I’m Not Charismatic’” (a 22-page PDF file). They’ve done a good job in critiquing Patton’s paper and causing us, in every position, to consider our own arguments more carefully. [ Added: …and here’s their response all on a 43-page PDF file ]
- Post 1 – by Marv
- Post 2 – by Scott
- Post 3 – by Marv
- Post 4 – by Scott
- Post 5 – by Marv
- Post 6 – by Scott
- Post 7 – by Marv
- Post 8 – by Scott
I’m planning on reading this document and encouraging others to do the same. 😉
LikeLike
I would consider myself charismatic too but I should probably be considered a “continuationist” too. It’s a term we all have to become more familiar with. Problem is, not many have ever heard of this term.
LikeLike
I skimmed through the discussion, and there was some good coverage of terminology in particular. I loosely refer to myself as a Pentecostal or Charismatic, though it seems perhaps “Continuationist” is probably the most accurate descriptor. Thanks for taking the time to link to everything. 8)
LikeLike
Hey, we have also just posted up a PDF document as well. You can get it by clicking here.
LikeLike
Thanks Scott. I’ve added the link to it on the post too. It’ll be easier to read everything on a single document.
LikeLike
Thanks Kevin.
LikeLike