An interesting theological post by Henry Neufeld on Threads from Henry’s Web who argues the other side against Penal Substitutionary Atonement (PSA), an established atonement theory. He says it has no scriptural basis but many can also show that it does have a strong scriptural basis. Well, PSA was something I’ve always believed in as a basic doctrine and it will be very difficult to disprove it. Personally, I do not think that any of the atonement theories should be exclusive because they all have scriptural basis. Anyways, it’s an interesting post with an argument that makes logical sense, and is fodder for one’s mind.